Video in English
↓↓↓
The alliance of silence - https://t.co/JCOcPSGaIO— Pilar Fernandez (@pilaraymara) 19 de diciembre de 2018
Concentración de traballadores e traballadoras da #CRTVG agora mesmo ante o Parlamento de Galicia #CRTVGenfolga pic.twitter.com/0f5tDW0dIt— Pilar Fernandez (@pilaraymara) 19 de diciembre de 2018
We live in a Union where the UK Gov now feels free to refer Scottish Gov legislation they don't like to the Supreme Court as a delaying tactic, so they can then re-write the law to overrule that Scottish Gov legislation before it can take effect.#BetterTogether— Meanwhile in Scotia (@MeanwhileScotia) 13 de diciembre de 2018
This is an important vindication for @ScotGov - with the exception of just one section, the Scottish Continuity Bill WAS within @ScotParl competence at point of introduction. https://t.co/r3ApADS7ln— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) 13 de diciembre de 2018
You can listen to the Official Statement of the Lord Advocate in the @ScotParl here: https://t.co/4Yc9b5IVZU pic.twitter.com/L1idQduR3T
— Pilar Fernandez (@pilaraymara) 13 de diciembre de 2018
Lord Advocate explained today how the #ContinuityBill was at the time it was approved by overall majority, competence of the @ScotParl and why the move made by the UK Government changed the situation— Pilar Fernandez (@pilaraymara) 13 de diciembre de 2018
Full video here: https://t.co/4Yc9b5IVZU pic.twitter.com/VPBuFXCvdG
Scottish Minister for #Brexit @Feorlean commenting on the #ContinuityBill ruling: "It show that the UK Government's behaviour is utterly shambolic and incompetent and against democratic interests" #BrexitShambles#ToryBrexitshambles pic.twitter.com/lvhoL8qb3E— Pilar Fernandez (@pilaraymara) 13 de diciembre de 2018
Shameless spin. The nub of today's decision? Elements of Holyrood's Brexit Bill conflict with UK legislation passed *after* MSPs voted through the Bill. The UK Supreme Court is clear the Bill was substantively lawful when passed. Bad law for these chumps = not having a 🔮. https://t.co/riB3xjwju1— PeatWorrier (@PeatWorrier) 13 de diciembre de 2018
Este es un muy recomendable artículo de @PeatWorrier para los que estéis interesados en saber qué pasó ayer con la Ley Alternativa de #Brexit para Escocia, la llamada #ContinuityBill y que explica cómo el Gobierno británico maniobró para bloquear una ley escocesa legítima y legal https://t.co/tN9qsUqzFB— Pilar Fernandez (@pilaraymara) 14 de diciembre de 2018
A great summary from @joannaccherry on the ruling of the #ContinuityBill 🤓#Scotland #Brexit pic.twitter.com/Vu9TpviClN— Pilar Fernandez (@pilaraymara) 13 de diciembre de 2018
Good point. Presiding Officer was wrong. However the Continuity Bill was legal at the time it was passed, but 'cos UKGovt changed laws BEFORE it became an Act, some of the devolved areas ceased to be devolved & therefore ScotParl now can't legislate on those things. #Colonialism— MajorBloodnok (@MajorMcBloodnok) 13 de diciembre de 2018
Continuity Bill – Ken Macintosh should resign as Presiding Officerhttps://t.co/vLki06xkkK— Indyref2 (@IndyrefTWO) 13 de diciembre de 2018
The Supreme Court Judgement and Scotland’s Colonial Status - London's Supreme Court, sitting in judgement on its Scottish colony, has ruled that parts of the Scottish Government's UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill https://t.co/2Flgk9oMGz— Craig Murray (@CraigMurrayOrg) 13 de diciembre de 2018
Case C-621/18 #Wightman. Full Text of judgment now online: https://t.co/bLWYCHXCbr— EU Court of Justice (@EUCourtPress) 10 de diciembre de 2018
URXENTE: A Corte de Xustiza Europea confirma que Reino Unido é libre de revocar unilateralmente o artigo 50 #Article50— Pilar Fernandez (@pilaraymara) 10 de diciembre de 2018
BREAKING :
UK is free to unilaterally revoke the notification of its intention to withdraw from the EU #Brexit pic.twitter.com/vCbX2MwIsU
Statement from @GoodLawProject on the Article 50 case. pic.twitter.com/VZ5kLR41nP— Jo Maugham QC (@JolyonMaugham) 10 de diciembre de 2018
Welcome decision by CJEU. Thank you to everyone who supported us - especially legal team led by Aidan O'Neil QC & instructed by @elainemotion97 and, vitally, @JolyonMaugham and the @GoodLawProject. Full Ruling published soon. https://t.co/1kgF0dXuXX— Andy Wightman MSP (@andywightman) 10 de diciembre de 2018
Joint statement @joannaccherry and I on the huge win in the ECJ. The UK *can*, *unilaterally* revoke Article 50. The Scottish Case has delivered. 🏴🇪🇺 https://t.co/UF7l0RBT2j— Alyn Smith MEP 🏴🇪🇺 (@AlynSmith) 10 de diciembre de 2018
So an extension of Article 50 to allow time for another vote, followed by revocation of Article 50 if the outcome is Remain seems to be an option that is now open to the House of Commons. #ECJ— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) 10 de diciembre de 2018
This is the 1st win for #Scotland in the #Brexit process. It won’t be the last. It shows what can be done when politicians from different parties work together in the national interest. Huge plaudits to my @scotgp & Labour co-petitioners #ScottishCase #Art50— Joanna Cherry QC MP (@joannaccherry) 10 de diciembre de 2018